Indeed... It might still be useful though.
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 21:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > this is really only useful for non-bayesian spam filtering tho... > > Jeff > > On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 18:24, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 16:17, Dave Malcolm wrote: > > > Something I occasionally find useful: > > > * "why was this email marked as spam?" > > > > > > It's nice when you spot a false positive to be able to track down why it > > > got marked as spam; need some kind of UI for this, which I suspect would > > > be heavily backend-dependent. > > > > > > Currently I find myself manually invoking span assassin and searching > > > through the headers, which I wouldn't wish on an end-user. > > > > Hmm yeah, that would be nice... > > > > It could make for a good 2.2 feature. :-) -- Ettore Perazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
