On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 14:27, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 16:13, Hans Petter Jansson wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 14:12, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 04:14, Hans Petter Jansson wrote: > > > > > 1) Let "new addressbook" do local addressbooks only. Less work, poorer > > > > UI. > > > > > > > > 2) Integrate LDAP source setup into the "new addressbook" dialog somehow > > > > - for instance, if the user creates an LDAP source, the druid could pop > > > > up prompting for further information [although we might want to do it in > > > > the same dialog - requires thought]. More work, better UI. We could > > > > leave the Directory Servers configuration in, since it lets you edit > > > > existing entries. > > > > > > > > What do you prefer? I'm sure you (at least JP and Chris) have thoughts > > > > on this. I'd like to hear them. > > > > > > We want to do 2) I think because for every backend that gets added its > > > unlikely we want to do a separate config control. I also think it > > > should be done without popping up an additional dialog (dialogs on > > > dialogs is never nice). As for existing directory servers, these should > > > be configured via the migrate () shell component mechanism. Now, where > > > the UI bits reside for each backend type is a different issue, but > > > probably in evolution for now is fine (although try and keep the ldap > > > and local bits atleast a bit separate in case we want to install them or > > > put them in e-d-s at some point). > > > > So I assume we're doing away with the preferences LDAP config control, > > then? > > >From my view point, yes.
We still need a way to edit existing ldap servers, though. Chris _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers