I've just started the localization of Evolution 2.0. It is a must to have it in the status pages.
But I dont know if it is going to be another release of 1.4 series. If there is a 1.4 release pending, we should not remove 1.4 branch until it has been finished. For now, maintain both. El lun, 15-12-2003 a las 20:22, Danilo Segan escribi�: > Gnome translators, and Evolution hackers, > > What do you feel about including Evolution HEAD in translation status > pages, instead of the current 1.4 branch (this includes modules gal, > gtkhtml and evolution). > > Changes in 1.4 are sufficiently minor that I think we don't need to > care much about it anymore, and 2.0 was proposed for inclusion in > Gnome 2.6, which, if accepted, would enlarge Gnome 2.6 desktop by some > 4k strings itself. That's the reason I think it's really important to > get translators' attention as soon as possible (and inclusion in > status pages is the best way to do that). > > On a similar note, even those who have translated Evolution 1.4 would > already have some work to do -- HEAD contains around 700 new or > changed messages, and this will probably grow as a result of either > bounty work, or further UI development. > > Tell me if I missed anything, but these are the modules I think of: > - evolution (from evolution-1-4-branch to HEAD) > - evolution-data-server (new module) > - gtkhtml (from evolution-1-4-branch to HEAD) > - gal (from evolution-1-4-branch to HEAD) > > Since Evolution hackers know better how stable current strings are, > and whether it would be a wasted effort if one would update > translation right now, I'm CCing to evolution-hackers list. > > Cheers, > Danilo > _______________________________________________ > gnome-i18n mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
