I still don't see what your issue is here. We just don't display it, it isn't lost. Just like we don't display comments in addresses either.
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 14:15 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 09:08 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > I don't think it is even supported by rfc2822 anymore anyway, is it? I > > seem to recall seeing that it was a deprecated syntax. > > �3.4 makes no mention of it being deprecated... > > group = display-name ":" [mailbox-list / CFWS] ";" > [CFWS] > > It goes on to explicitly describe the usage which I'm used to.... > > When it is desirable to treat several mailboxes as a single unit > (i.e., in a distribution list), the group construct can be used. The > group construct allows the sender to indicate a named group of > recipients. This is done by giving a display name for the group, > followed by a colon, followed by a comma separated list of any number > of mailboxes (including zero and one), and ending with a semicolon. > Because the list of mailboxes can be empty, using the group construct > is also a simple way to communicate to recipients that the message > was sent to one or more named sets of recipients, without actually > providing the individual mailbox address for each of those > recipients. > > > -- > dwmw2 _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
