Sure, why not? Why is it any different to preview_active? On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 13:41 +0100, ERDI Gergo wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Not Zed wrote: > > > > + gboolean do_statusbar; > > > > > > call this statusbar_active and have it in the public object, as with > > preview_active. > > Are you sure about this? Very Bad Things could happen if some outside code > messed with this directly instead of using set_statusbar() > > -- > .--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what > \ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001 > `---= [EMAIL PROTECTED] =---' > All C programs are derived from `Hello World'. > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
_______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
