On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 15:48, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 08:40, JP Rosevear wrote: > > Another implementation attempt: > > > > http://primates.ximian.com/~jpr/screenshots/button-bar-1.png > > http://primates.ximian.com/~jpr/screenshots/button-bar-2.png > > http://primates.ximian.com/~jpr/screenshots/button-bar-3.png > > > > Basically it takes the maximum button width of all the buttons and if it > > has only enough space for one across then it does that, other wise it > > fits a minimum of two in with even numbers of rows where possible, if > > not possibly you get shot 2 where the odd button is at the bottom. > > Looks ok. The number 2 looks kinda silly, but then again, I dont think > many people will resize their sidebar *that* wide anyway.
I thought this is what we discussed on the phone though. > The padding stuff I wrote on my longer mail about the HIG patches would > apply to this too. > > > Finally you get shot 3 where all the buttons fit in one row. If there > > were 4 buttons it would go rows of 1, 2, 4 buttons wide. If there were > > 6 buttons it go rows of 1, 2, 3, 6 buttons wide. > > number 3 shot is missing. Its just a 5 button wide shot. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ximian, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
