On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 17:37 +0200, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 17:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > I wonder if the url shouldn't be more like: > > > > nntp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/#comp.lang.c > > For users it could be more like: "comp.lang.c in news.host.com", the uri > looks scary. The "plain english" one is longer, yeah, but most of the > time you dont want to crosspost anyway.. :)
This was more of an internally thing I think. I'm not sure about the idea: 1. it does simplify a little bit of code, but the amount of simplification isn't great (i.e. mostly just url->fragment?url- >fragment:url->path to url->path in a few places). 2. its another uri format change (but now thankfully independent of filters) 3. i think a better idea would be to put the camel accounts as a camel account objects, and have all uri's relative to that rather than mapping to the physical stores. well maybe its better, thats a big change _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
