On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 15:11, Rodney Dawes wrote: > Because one shouldn't need to have Evolution itself running, we have > already passed the feature freeze, I did this in my spare time, and it > is useful for use outside of the context of Evolution where apps want > to display appointments from webcal calendars.
Makes a lot of sense now. Thanks for clarifying. Luis > It doesn't make sense to pile more things into evolution, when we are > moving toward having a separated structure for things like this. > > -- dobey > > > On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 14:28 -0500, Luis Villa wrote: > > Why is it a separate app and not evo itself registering itself as the > > webcal handler? > > Luis > > > > On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 14:48, Rodney Dawes wrote: > > > http://www.gnome.org/~dobey/evolution-webcal.png > > > > > > and > > > > > > http://www.gnome.org/~dobey/evolution-webcal-1.0.tar.bz2 > > > > > > > > > That is all. :) > > > > > > -- dobey > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
