On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 12:26, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 11:40, Tim Lee wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 18:59, Chris Toshok wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 13:54, Tim Lee wrote: > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Operations possible on the "me" vcard: > > > > > * The "me" vcard can't be deleted. > > > > Where would the "me" card be stored? In 1.5 you can currently delete any > > > > addressbook including the default (Personal). > > > > > > The "me" card would be in the local address book. I consider it a bug > > > that you can remove, honestly. I mean there are some forms of deletion > > > (rm -r ~/.evolution) we can't provide a defense against, but e-d-s can > > > refuse to remove the local/system contact folder. > > > > > > > > > > Hi JP, > > > > Any decision yet on whether people should be allowed to delete the > > default local Personal calendar/tasks/contacts folders? It seems like > > not having a default folder is just going to cause problems. Since they > > can rename it anyway I'm thinking we should not let them delete it. > > Well with Toshok's new API bits, the system calendar will always exist > even if its not shown to the user. I'm not sure what to think about > enforcing non-deletion, seems reasonable I guess, however with clients > other than evolution it can be erased anyhow as it stands right now.
Right, the non-deletion code would be in e-d-s itself, not in evolution. You can still rm the file/directory, but e-d-s shouldn't allow the deletion of the calendar/addressbook. I mean, why would you ever want to? Chris _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers