Hey Tim,
> -- Tim > On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 20:07, Not Zed wrote: > > Ok everyone, so how about this: > > > > - we still have the global junk filter setting > > - we add 2 new settings to each imap account, which will appear next to > > the > > > > [ ] "Apply filters to new messages in INBOX on this server" > > -> > > [ ] "Do not check incoming message for Junk" > Just a personal preference but generally I think it's more intuitive > when checking a checkbox to enables rather than disables a function. > > Couldn't we label the check box as "Check incoming messages for Junk" > and have it "checked" by default. Yeah this is actually how i did it in the end. I did it as above because that was how the existing code did it internally - i swapped the sense of the flag. I don't have it on by default because it requires extra external dependencies which may not be available, but i suppose that's a packaging issue. > > [ ] "Only check for Junk for new messages in INBOX" > Would this be checked by default? The cause of slowness when copying > messages may not be obvious, but junk mail in other folders would be. I don't know, suggestions? _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
