On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 04:19, Not Zed wrote: > In response to my mail on evolution@, someone suggested we make a syncml > based interface so that others could write the importers (?more? > easily?). I guess that could be an idea, if it can support enough info > anyway (accounts, filters?, folders, etc), although the overhead of > going through XML would be extremely prohibitive for mailboxes - there > can be a LOT of data to import, and it can be slow enough going fd- > >memory->fd as it is. Maybe another future bounty though?
The problem with syncml (at least last time i checked) is that it is not guaranteed patent free and its controlled by a consortium. We could re-investigate that i guess. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ximian, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
