the single biggest improvement in "make install"'s runtime that I've seen came from switching from ext3 to xfs.
I'm still with NotZed, though. I'm still not a believer that the wasted time spent inside libtool's maze of opaque shell script is serving us better than ~500 lines of custom makefile code (which would doubtlessly run much, much faster than even 1.4.4). Chris On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 09:16 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 08:23, Dan Winship wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 19:57, Not Zed wrote: > > > I presume you mean doesn't? > > > > > > Anyway, this is what happened to me, 1 line change in a small file in > > > mail, cd to mail: > > > > > > time make install > > > libtool 1.5.3 - 3 minutes > > > libtool 1.4.4 - 30 seconds > > > > Hm... I've got libtool 1.5 (.0 i guess) and it takes 30 seconds to > > recompile one file and relink (though this is on a 2.2GHz processor). So > > either they seriously broke things in a point release, or there's > > something really wrong on your machine. (Or you have a really slow > > machine and should bug JP about getting you an upgrade. :) > > Also, I'm using the libtool from jhbuild bootstrap, and jhbuild patches > it, so maybe that helps. > > -JP > -- > JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ximian, Inc. > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers