> Right, the patched OpenLDAP doesn't actually depend on evolution, it's > just that the new API isn't useful on its own. > But anyway, we should try to get a better solution. If the OpenLDAP team > is interested in adding NTLM support to OpenLDAP, then we can send them
There IS work underway to add NTLM support to OpenLDAP. I know that at least the effort to integrate Samba/Heimdal/OpenLDAP includes NTLM support (this is to produce a psuedo-ActiveDirectory). > a self-contained patch and get that added. If not, they may still be ok > with adding either the specific API we're currently using, or a more > generic low-level API that could possibly be used for other things. > Either way though, it would be a while before the changes made it into a > stable release, and from there into the various distros... Since recent Cyrus SASL adds NTLM support, server side support is almost certainly available (it is listed as a support mechanism on my lab OpenLDAP DSA when I query the root DSE). But I haven't tested it on the client side. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
