On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 13:07 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 12:31 -0400, Dan Winship wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 11:52 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 16:56 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > > Last call for Evolution road map feedback. > > > > > > > > -JP > > > > > > Somewhat late here, but something I'd like to hack on for 2.2 is a > > > rewrite of the way Evolution stores its configuration information - last > > > time I looked, it stores hierarchical configuration for the various > > > objects as single strings in GConf (containing XML streams). I'd prefer > > > it if the hierarchy was stored in expanded form within the GConf > > > database as separate keys and values. > > > > The problem with this is that there's (currently) no way to express this > > in a GConf schema. (You could specify properties for a single account, > > but the only way to have an arbitrary number of something is to have a > > single list-valued property like we do now.) > > Or have the things as subdirectories/subfolders within GConf, and set up > the schema on-the-fly based on the type of the object?
Possibly, but then you can't get atomic notifications for the object as a whole afaik. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
