On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 16:34 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 10:57 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > > > * Fewer packages to maintain. > > > > > > > I would add: > > > * a single package for accessing all evolution data. > > You mean, apart from libsoup, gnome and gtk+ libs, etc :) > yeah :) that's why it could be a good reason: to avoid increasing the > set of dependencies. Well, I guess this is really about adding a lot of deps for Camel users vs. adding one dep for e-d-s users. The decision will have to be based on, for each group (camel, e-d-s), the number of persons expected to be in that group multiplied by the amount of suffering the extra deps will cause. Camel: Few users * lots of suffering. e-d-s: Lots of users * little suffering. :) I lean towards an independent Camel because I think it's got potential for a greater user base, though. -- Hans Petter _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
