On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 10:47 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 00:54 +1300, Matt Brown wrote: > > 2) Required Support > > The bounty lists the require functionality as "support of inline-pgp" > > emails, with an extension of allowing them to be sent. > > > > Given that there seems to be widespread agreement that inline pgp is > > broken fairly fundamentally, would a patch that only implemented > > decryption / viewing support of received messages be acceptable? > > I would personally be happy with that, but I'm not sure if just that > much would qualify for the bounty or not (jpr?) > > certainly rendering received inline-pgp messages is by far the more > important of the 2.
I agree, it is more important. I think if this was done well, we could separate the two items out (sending and receiving) and pay the same bounty for both. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
