On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:36 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 19:52 -0500, Tom Copeland wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 18:54 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > > Is there a preferred way to handle these things? The first way strikes > > > > me as more readable... just wondering if that was the usual > > > > convention... > > > > > > You should prefer the first. The libical/e-cal-component stuff is a bit > > > of a mismash, but unless the e-cal-component is missing the API you > > > need, use it. > > > > Cool, thanks, that makes sense. > > > > Also, thanks for Evolution! I've used it for the past 3-4 years and it > > is really a beautiful piece of work. Now that I'm actually writing some > > code that interfaces with it, I like it even better :-) > > Writing anything interesting?
Just a little Ruby binding: http://revolution.rubyforge.org/ Yours, Tom _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
