On Sunday 03 April 2005 20:41, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > El dom, 03-04-2005 a las 18:51 +0200, Ingo KlÃcker escribiÃ: > [...] > > > Why a DBUS service instead of a library? The implementors will > > anyway need to use gpgme (I guess you don't plan to replace gpgme, > > et al.). At least for OpenPGP there is no reasonable alternative. > > Of course, the problem is that gpgme is still GPL licensed. > > You are wrong here. From 1.0.2 version, the gpgme license is LGPL.
Oops. I guess I should have checked. Thanks for correcting me, Jose. Regards, Ingo
pgpnvjyr1xM4U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
