On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 18:44 +0200, Till Adam wrote:
> On Saturday 09 April 2005 18:34, Nat Friedman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:48 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 19:23 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > The hard part is detecting when the user meant to attach something.
> > >
> > > As with anything in the domain of automatic double-checking of humans, a
> > > 90% solution is nearly always better than a zero, as a 100% solution is
> > > unobtainable.
> >
> > KMail looks for the i18n string "attach".
>
> Actually it looks for a user configurable set of strings. i18n("attach") is
> among the defaults. The feature is configurable, but on by default. We've had
> a lot of positive feedback on this little bugger. Many of us were very
> sceptical that it would be well received, but it seems users like it a lot.
It seems like a great idea to me certainly.
One way to deal with potential user irritation is to include a
[ ] Don't ask about this again
on the warning dialog.
Nat
_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
