On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 20:32 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > I wouldn't say that a patch that didn't get approval is (always) because > of political reasoning. >
Maybe that was a poor choice of words. What I meant was just that if you don't need "hidejunk", maybe because you have a good spam filter on the mail server, then from your perspective my patch is acceptable, even though it can't be merged because some users need this feature. On a related note, I have another proof of concept patch that speeds up the interface even more, by disabling the regeneration of the "Unmatched" vfolder whenever any vfolder is rebuilt. I haven't even posted this one, for obvious reasons, but if you never use "unmatched" then it's effectively a free performance boost. Are these the kinds of patches the OP was looking for? Lee _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
