On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 18:00 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > I replied to this before but my message didn't get to the list it seems. > > On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 14:15 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > Ross Burton writes: > > > As some of you will know, recently I've been working on porting EDS to > > > use DBus instead of Bonobo. > > > > Nice! I will then have to start working on the DBus to Win32 port > > again. (Haven't looked at it since February or so. It did seem to work > > rather well at that time on Win32, but in the meantime there has > > obviously been lots of changes in DBus.) > > > > (Hmm, I guess Evolution will still be using bonobo indirectly through > > libgnome, gnome-vfs or whatnot, though?) > > Absolustely not ... Evolution will still be using bonobo directly to > talk to EDS. > it would be nice to have a comparison of performance of the 2 branches. That is, can someone write a stress test program and run it through the CORBA and the DBus branches? -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
