Yes, separate memory objects. Not separate threads - which wouldn't make sense, how could you possibly call any of its synchronous methods otherwise.
Behind the abstraction you can do whatever you want though, of course; monitoring threads, thread per invocations, nothing special, etc. On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 13:10 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 19:02 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > No, they all share the same unix process (how could any pointers work > > otherwise), for all stores of all types. > > So by "instances" he meant "instantiated as separate memory objects"? Do > these instances live in separate threads? > -- adfa(evolution-2.4:20087): gtkhtml-WARNING **: cannot find icon: 'stock_insert-url' in gnome _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
