On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 07:48, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Not really, no. You'll have to go digging through the source code. > > Most of camel/ is documented using gtk-doc style comment. > > Anyways, that said - the best way to do what you want to do would be to > talk to the mailer via CORBA but I don't think we have any external IDL > interfaces for that kind of things right now and I'm not sure how > complicated it would be to add them. Surely we won't get to this until > after 1.2 is released anyway, too busy in bugfix mode to add new > features.
the summary uses similar interfaces that might be usable. the camel code (e.g. the tests/folder tests) shows how to open a folder, once opened various details are available. might be easier just to recognise the X-Evolution header format, its basically: XXXXXXXX-YYYY [; optional tags/flags] the YYYY bit is a 16 bit bitfield in hexadecimal, camel-folder-summary.h defines the bits (comment 'system flag bits'). XXXXXXXX is the uid in hex. with 1.2, for external mbox or mbox directory trees, theres a checkbox to enable Status/X-Status headers. if u turn this on tho, it can significantly impact perf. u could also just use maildir, it uses the standard format for maildir names. > Jeff > > On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 17:57, Andy Cedilnik wrote: > > Ok, this one is a bit more Evolution-hackers... > > > > Is there a documentation for the API of the evolution headers? > > I would like to have (develop) a command line utility that will display > > if there are any new mails in any of my mailboxes. > > > > Andy > > > > On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 17:40, Peter Williams wrote: > > > We use a different header to record the read status of a message, > > > because the standard header makes it so that the entire mbox must be > > > rewritten if a message is marked as seen, which is pretty silly. > > > > > > I know that there's compatability code to enable standard-style status > > > headers in version 1.1, but I'm not sure how to enable it. > > > > > > Also, this question would have been better directed at > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; this list is for discussing development of > > > Evolution. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > -- > Jeffrey Stedfast > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
