Hi Peter,
Thanks for the patches. But patches should really be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks again,
Cheers,
partha

On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 14:47 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> A couple of days ago I reported that I was having problems compiling
> eds on FC4. The problem was due to FC4's strict policy of implicit
> declarations. I worked it out and here's a basic patch. Now I'm having
> similar problems with evo 2.4.1 with a new function that was added to
> fix bug #264449 that didn't have the corresponding proto type added
> the the .h file. The file is calendar/gui/e-calendar-table.[ch] with
> the function being e_calendar_table_process_completed_tasks. I can
> sort of see what needs to be added by aren't sure of the proper
> combination. The .h file then needs to be included in e-task.c too
> (with a
> small patch for that attached too.
> 
> I think also that redhat has a number of other includes fixed in a
> patch that's included with their rpm.
> 
> In the mean time I'm using eds 1.4.1.1 and exchange/webcal 2.4.1 with
> evo 2.4.0 which has fixed the worst of the problems I was having with
> exchange on 2.4
> 
> Cheers,
> Pete
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to