On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 05:25 +0200, guenther wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 22:03 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 01:37 +0200, guenther wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 08:15 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 15:30 -0700, Scott Anderson wrote: > > [snip] > > > > I posted this a while ago on this list. > > > > > > > > You can get mail-notification to work with a simple patch if you're > > > > happy to compile it from source. I have it working with 2.6 quite > > > > nicely. > > > > > > Updating and fixing this is the distros duty, IMHO. > > > > Why? > > Because that's what distros do -- providing a working set of apps. :) > > The original post mentioned mail-notification working with Evo 2.4, > which changed when upgrading Evo to 2.6. Caring about such issues is one > of the core duties of a distro. If they are going to update any app or > library, they absolutely need to make sure that any app that depends on > it still works afterwards. > > (In this special case though we should not forget that Evo 2.6 is in > Debian testing/unstable only. Whoever opts to use a non-stable branch > must expect possible breakage anytime.)
Hmmm. I was under the impression that mail-notification broke upstream (Debian terminology, in this case, for you all). -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA "Confidence is contagious. So is lack of confidence." Vince Lombardi _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
