On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 23:18 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 02:35 +0100, Alfredo Matos wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 15:35 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 19:58 +0100, Alfredo Matos wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 00:21 -0600, Sankar P wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 21:19 +0100, Alfredo Matos wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I use an IMAP server which is integrated with spamassassin, a fairly > > > > > > common and widespread setup. The spam is marked at the server and > > > > > > automatically moved to trash. But, evolution's Unread Search Folder > > > > > > fulter insists on marking it as unread, mixing it with my normal > > > > > > mail, > > > > > > which is rather annoying. > > > > > > > > > > > > The question is how to filter out messages that are so they don't > > > > > > show > > > > > > up on the unread search folder. Back in earlier versions of EVO, it > > > > > > was > > > > > > possible to define the Search Folder rules based on specific header > > > > > > rules, but that is not true anymore, any special reason why ? > > > > > > > > > > You can still do it. Just see if you have added the header to the list > > > > > of headers that are fetched (edit->preferences->edit_account, IMAP > > > > > Headers tab) > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried this, but nothing changes in the rule interface, like "Edit > > > > Search folder". > > > > > > > > I want to properly parse the mails that have spam information, set by > > > > the mail server, such as: > > > > > > > > " > > > > X-Spam-Flag: YES > > > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on mail > > > > X-Spam-Level: ***************************** > > > > " > > > > > > > > Any thoughts ? > > > > > > You can set a filter rule (note: not a search folder rule) to match a > > > specific header, so the trick would be to match X-Spam-Flag and set the > > > message status to Read. > > > > > > poc > > > > > > > Hi. Thanks for that, it works, but only on Evo 2.11 . I have 2.10 in my > > production machine, I can set it up, but it doesn't apply the filters to > > incoming messages e.g i have to select the unread messages and apply the > > filters. > > Automatic filters only apply to new messages in the Inbox. "Newness" is > an IMAP server concept, and anything that reads a message makes it no > longer new, so it could depend on exactly how the server-side spam > filter works. If it's part of the MTA delivery chain it should be OK, > but if it's done post-delivery then Evo filters will not apply. You > should also make sure that nothing else is reading messages (include > mail notifiers, other clients etc.)
It's part of the delivery chain (maildrop runs spam check, virus check and delivery rule check), but spam is matched to a Spam IMAP folder (read on). > > > In 2.11 i can mark it as apply to all incoming, and i can run > > filters on folder with Ctrl+Y, something that doesn't happen on 2.10. > > Ctrl-Y does work on 2.10, or did you mean something else? It works with messages selected. I can't say for instance, apply to a folder. > > > Is there some trick to enable filters on all incoming messages on 2.10 ? > > Only for the Inbox as far as I can see. > > poc Ok, checked that, but the problem persists with my imap setup, since the server (running spamassassin, clamav etc i.e. the whole nine yards), places the spam in a spam folder. Maybe this is something to be fixed in new Evo releases ? Make the filters apply to all unread in case of IMAP, and keep the just Inbox behavior for POP. Thanks, Alfredo. _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
