On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 12:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 09:38 -0600, Todd Ness wrote: > > The first thing that jumps out at me on the documentation link provided > > are the evolution 2.6 release notes. Which makes me think that oh this > > must be an unmaintained site. > > > > Then if you study carefully you might notice this small FAQ and user > > manual for 2.12. > > > > Maybe that ought to be re-done so that what you want people to see/use > > is prominent. It is just a suggestion though. I could be one of the rare > > Morons that gets distracted by the old version number being 3 times the > > size of the current documentation > > I agree. The fact of the matter is that the site *has* been more or > less unmaintained for awhile. I've been trying, in recent weeks, to > blow the dust off and get things up-to-date again. I do intend to > update the release notes there for version 2.12. My own procrastination > is to blame for that. :) > > I should also mention that I created a new "Website" Bugzilla category > for the Evolution component. Please feel free to file website bugs or > suggestions for improvement there. I'll be monitoring that category.
Does this mean you are now the person to yell at about documentation? :-) poc _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
