Hi there, I changed Tinymail's build setup to simply merge its camel and its camel-provider together.
This posed no problems other than having to adapt the Makefile.am of all providers and changing the .pc file. Because this might make startup time a little bit faster (no need to mmap two shared object files, for example), I wonder why the decision was made to split the library up into two parts? I kinda like the split because in code-architecture this will make it more easy to migrate to GMime one day. But other than that, I'm not getting the point ... Anyway, I changed Tinymail's camel-lite vs. camel-lite-provider by letting it compile to one shared object file. This is working fine and on the Nokia tablet might make startup a tiny bit faster. Probably not really measurably faster, though. -- Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org http://pvanhoof.be/blog http://codeminded.be _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
