On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 02:19 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > Uhm, why has this been cross-posted to the hackers list in the first > place?
No idea. I just replied to the lists as shown. > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 15:18 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:53 -0700, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: > > > Um, wrong answer. He wanted to know if evolution supports message > > > priority, not "marking as important". Message priority allows the > > > >>sender<< to assign a message priority from low = 5, to critical = 1 > > > to the message in the hopes that it helps the receiver determine what > > > emails to read first. This uses the "non-standard" mail header > > > X-Priority. > > Evolution supports X-Priority: 1 (critical), and normal email. > > IIRC, an important part of the discussion back those days was, that it > is none of the senders business to re-arrange *my* (being the recipient) > priority queue. Yup. I definitely remember that (sometime heated) discussion. That combined with it being under the "Insert" menu, made so I missed it being added. Seems amusing to me that it was added after Novell acquired Ximian. Maybe a manager "suggested" it. ;-) Lonnie Borntreger _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
