On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 10:15 +0200, Rainer Klier wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 10.06.2008, 13:19 +0530 schrieb Johnny Jacob: > > On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 08:34 +0200, Rainer Klier wrote: > > > > so why or where is the bug, why 2.23.3 doesn't find e_dbhash_new whereas > > > 2.23.1 has no problems finding it. > > > > > > this problem first occured in version 2.23.2. > > > > > > does anybody know where this problem comes from? > > > > This is fixed in trunk. > > > > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution/trunk/ChangeLog?r1=35581&r2=35597 > > > > this link leads to the changelog of the changelog ;-) > > but where do i find the patch/diff for the sourceode, or the already > patched sourcecode?
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution/trunk/configure.in?view=patch&r1=35597&r2=35596&pathrev=35597 -- Johnny Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://johnnyjacob.org GPG fingerprint = E296 D0B9 77D9 D968 5574 DB0D 5FD0 B7CA 03DC E845
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
