> > And then follow it up with "reply to considered useful":
> > http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
>
> But you cannot forget the coupe de grace, "'Reply-To' Munging Still
> Considered Harmful. Really."
> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html
This third essay should put and end to these kind of discussions,
indeed.
However the "features every reasonably modern mail client must provide"
mentioned in this debate are quite relevant to this list. Does Evolution
provide them? Namely,
* can I "reply all"? (Yes, of course)
* can I reply to one of the recipients by right clicking on the
corresponding address field? (No, in this case I must "reply
all" then remove the other addressees, which is sometimes no so
easy.)
* will Evolution identify the messages of the same ID? (probably
not)
* does Evolution handle the "List-Post:" header? (I don't know,
hopefully yes)
Best regards,
Alpar
>
> (BTW I just checked and the MA Ubuntu user's group list also doesn't set
> reply-to)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
