On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 08:48 -0500, Art Alexion wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 16:46 -0500, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Evo is the best for Exchange; kmail seems much better with Gmail > > IMAP. > > > > I have zero interest in Exchange. I keep having to find reasons (other > > than inertia) for sticking with Evo. I may re-evaluate the situation > > when Kmail moves to KDE4. > > > > I get the impression you've been at this long enough that you don't need > the warning, but I'll give it anyway. kmail 1.9.9 & 1.9.10 work well > (except for disconnected IMAP). Most KDE 4 stuff is still pretty buggy, > and not something I would want to depend upon. I assume kmail 2 with > akondi will be really good, but I doubt it won't have some serious > problems in its initial iteration.
I've downloaded the Fedora 10 Preview which came out yesterday. It includes kdepim 4 so I'll be able to do some testing. poc _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
