On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:56 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On 09/29/2009 11:37 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:30 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > >> On 09/29/2009 10:56 AM, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > >>> What about a move to trash allure? Seems like that might satisfy > >>> Everyone's concern...Sometimes the technically correct choice isn't > >>> always practical;-) > >> > >> You'll have to explain that. I don't know what you mean by "trash allure". > >> > >> poc > > > > Just make the Trash folder act like the search folders. So you're > > keeping the mark for deletion style but a copy(linkto the msg) is > > visible in the "Trash" folder. This way you're not changing any protocol > > or technology applied, your just playing with the way deleted messages > > are seen...just a thought. > > How is that different from the way the Trash folder already works? Trash > *is* a search folder. The contents are physically in the same place they > were before being deleted. They haven't been moved (and don't have to be > moved back if they're undeleted). That's the whole point. > > The Junk folder works the same way BTW. > > poc
I guess I'll vote for keeping things the way they are then ;)
Cheers,
Phil
<<attachment: face-wink.png>>
_______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
