On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 16:11 +0000, Steve T wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 09:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: 
> > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 07:11 +0000, Steve T wrote:
> > > > As long as you copy everything while neither Evo nor Gconf are
> > > running
> > > > (see the FAQ answer) then you should be OK. The first time the new
> > > > version of Evo runs on the new machine it will do any required
> > > > conversion.
> > > > 
> > > > poc
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Patrick,
> > > The 'migration' in this case was from FC9 to FC12 (on separate
> > > laptops)
> > > - the 'old' Evolution settings were 'Backed Up' via the Evolution
> > > option
> > > and that file was then used in the start up routine on the new laptop
> > > to
> > > import the setting etc (there was an option to import the data and
> > > settings from a file).
> > > 
> > > That all ran fine and I now have what appears to be a fully working
> > > Evolution running under FC12. 
> > > 
> > > The only issues that I see so far are:
> > > 1) The 'search' folders seem very slow in updating the screen display.
> > > It takes a while (Generating Message list) moving between one folder
> > > and
> > > the next.
> > 
> > Is this always the case, or only when visiting a folder for the first
> > time? If the latter, it could be the conversion to SQL that's taking the
> > time (I don't know if this happens "on demand" or just once when Evo
> > starts up).
> 
> It's all the time - both at startup (about 5+mins to have fully
> processed the inbox), and then switching search folders after load can
> be slow. I have quite a few 'search' folders and the length of time
> taken to display the contents seems directly related to the complexity
> of the search (ie number of criteria) 

That could happen of course, for very complex searches.

> > > 2) The unread count in the folders is not always accurate. This seems
> > > to
> > > self correct when Evolution is closed down and restarted.
> > 
> > Known bug. I get it too. Very annoying. And it doesn't always go away
> > just by restarting Evo. Sometimes you have to unsubscribe the folder,
> > sometimes even disable the mail server and re-enable it.
> So far it has been ok with just restarting Evolution. But it's not
> major for me - a bigger problame that I've noticed is that the search
> folders don't always honour the rules. A case in point is a search
> folder that I have for the 'Last 24 Hours' where the rules are sent
> after a day ago or received after a day ago. Under the 'new' version
> that has been showing mails that are weeks old (that do not appear on
> the 'old' version. 

I don't use "Sent Date" for anything as it's unreliable (it depends on
the sender having a working clock). Have you tried Right-click Refresh
on this folder?

Also, you haven't said if you're using IMAP or POP. It might be
relevant.

> > > I'm not reporting those two as issues per se - I'll check around over
> > > the next few days to see what I can find.
> > > 
> > > PS Can you see where the 'indexes' etc are now held in mysql?
> > 
> > they are .db files under ~/.evolution/mail.
> > 
> > > And does
> > > that means that all the 'summary' files etc in the evolution folder
> > > structure are now completely redundant?
> > 
> > No idea I'm afraid.
> > 
> > BTW if indexing seems slow you can run the following script (due to
> > Srini), after shutting down Evo completely (--force-shutdown):
> > 
> >         cd ~/.evolution/mail/
> >         for i in `find . -name folders.db`
> >                 do
> >                 echo "Rebuilding Table $i"
> >                 sqlite3 $i "vacuum;"
> >         done
> >         
> 
> I've created a job from that. I tried it by shutting down Evolution,
> then running the job (it showed the 'databases' being processed) - but
> after restarting Evolution the speed was still the same. I'm not sure
> whether  the speed problem is in table structure or in the
> indexing/purging of the 'deleted' space. 
> 
> I have just tried switching on the 'old' system to the 'worst' search
> folder and that comes up in a couple of seconds - in the new version,
> that's now in minutes.

Do you mean you have two parallel installations of Evo? I'm not sure how
that would work.

poc

_______________________________________________
Evolution-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to