On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 10:54 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 23:11 +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 22:32 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 15:29 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 21:09 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > > > El día Friday, September 10, 2010 a las 09:04:04PM +0200, W. Martin > > > > > Borgert escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > another Evolution converts problem: In mutt I can "o"rder > > > > > > "t"hreaded, > > > > > > in Thunderbird is a root-symbol to have a threaded view. But how can > > > > > > I get the threaded view in Evolution? > > > > > > > > > > Ctrl-t > > > > > > > > > > matthias > > > > > > > > One caveat (as far as I can tell) is that, although the messages are > > > > displayed in threaded order, the Next function still plays them in order > > > > received and not thread order. It has not been annoying enough to me to > > > > find out if it is configurable but it has led to unexpected opening of > > > > emails some of which I might not intend to open, e.g,. junk that has > > > > gotten through the filters - John > > > > > > I've never seen it do that. Next goes to the next message as displayed > > > in the message list. If the list is threaded, the order of arrival does > > > not affect this as far as I can see. > > > > > > poc > > > > I see the behaviour as you, Patrick, describe when reading messages in > > the preview pane and the behaviour John describes when reading messages > > in a separate window. Evo 2.30.3 > > Ah, now I get it. He hadn't mentioned it was a separate window. This was > actually discussed not so long ago (see the list archives). The problem > is that the message list order can be threaded, or the result of a > search (not to mention watching a different folder, or even a completely > different account). Also, you can order it by arrival date or by sent > date or by Subject or sender or ... Furthermore, you can have multiple > Evo windows at the same time, using different orderings. How is the > separate message window to know what you mean by "next"? It has to > assume "next message in arrival order in the same folder as the current > message". > > poc > That makes perfect sense. Thank you for the explanation - John
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
