On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:54 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 20:29 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 13:29 -0500, Philippe LeCavalier wrote: > > > Yes. I noticed that so at least it's not hard to recover. Forcing a > > > reset could be dangerous considering Evo could be intimately connected > > > to other sockets during which time it's hanging on others...In my case > > > it's not inconsistant at all. I can count on it hanging at 0%. I think > > > Adam's suggestion of turning some additional logging on is likely the > > > only way to "see" more info. > > > > > > Thanks again. I'll reply if I find anything. > > > > Hi, > > what about trying to see what is evolution doing that the process got > > stuck at 0%? Please install debug info packages for > > evolution-data-server and evolution. Then enter your search folder (the > > best when the initial update of folders after start will be done), and > > then run this command on a console: > > $ gdb --batch --ex "t a a bt" -pid=PID &>/tmp/bt.txt > > where PID is a process ID of a running evolution (you can get it by, for > > example, ps -A | grep evo). > > > > Then get the /tmp/bt.txt file, check if it doesn't contain any private > > data, like passwords, usernames, server addresses you do not want to > > share with others, and then post it here, though dealing with this > > through https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Evolution would > > be better, to not bother other users/readers of this list. > > > > You can also try to get backtrace after some time, say a minute or five, > > to see whether anything changes. Please check your CPU usage, which may > > indicate some processing and make sure you'll write exact versions of > > evolution-data-server and evolution you are using. > > Thanks and bye, > > Milan > Those are certainly the best technical approches :) Just out of > curiosity I tried removing the "is not" conditions(2) and the search > completed in no time and has all the relevant mail in it. So there > appears to be something with that condition... > Maybe the above would help flush that out...I always try the lists > before posting bugs just to avoid user issue clogging the system. If > this does turn out to be a bug I will certainly report it. Besides I > don't think anyone here minds? Is this in part what this list is for? > If not then my understanding of mailing lists is very inaccurate.
Use your judgement. A long and very technical thread may not be appropriate (the evolution-hackers list could be better) but the occasional trace is OK. Do take the trouble to send it as a compressed attachment though, or post it to a website, instead of creating huge messages people have to download. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
