> I do not think it will help at all. The Date header is just missing in > the source Eudora mbox file, that's why the summary shows "?" in the > date column. When you open the message, then the Date header is added by > evolution (or maybe slightly earlier, during the import) to the current > time you opened/imported the message.
So the Date: header in the message that the OP included is actually something added by Evo? I can understand why (in that RFC2822 mandates a date header), but why the inconsistency between what is shown in the list view and what is shown in message view? Also, rather than the current date being added, wouldn't it be more sensible to add an "impossible" date (like the Epoch) so that it's obvious that something is amiss? P. _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
