Am Donnerstag, den 24.11.2011, 11:06 +0100 schrieb Milan Crha: > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 15:23 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > > the attached message is signed but the signature is marked as invalid. > > > > I found the following fields. > > > > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha1"; > > protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-lYAU0MbfCPO/lYiSvhhG" > > > > Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" > > > > Can you tell me why, please? Is that an Evolution limitation or is was > > the message signed incorrectly?
> it works fine for me with evolution 3.3.2. What is your version, please? I am using Evolution 3.0.3 and Sylvia responding also to my message is using 2.32.2. I also filed this as bug #664657 [1]. > What does it claim about the signature exactly, please? The box is red and reads »Invalid signature« (German: »Ungültige Signatur«). > As an example, I see "Valid signature (David Woodhouse <...>)" on the > inner message, but "Signature exists, but need public key" on your > signature. I believe the later makes sense too, and can be probably the > reason for your error claim. When you click the icon on the left from > the signature claim inside the message, then you can see more details. The certificate for Intel(?) seems to be missing. Unterzeichner: <unknown> <<unknown>>: Signaturzertifikat nicht gefunden Signee(?): <unknown> <<unknown>>: signature certificate not found So I guess the error message should be improved by adding the reason to it: »Invalid signature (certificate not found)«. Thanks, Paul [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664657
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
