On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 07:52 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Milan, there's a warning at the top of that page to the effect that the > FAQ is no longer maintained and no material should be added to it. I > personally consider this a big mistake as in my view a FAQ and a > reference manual are two different things, plus the FAQ is much more > convenient as a reference point for specific issues, but that's how > things currently stand.
I'm the one to blame as I added this. IMO anything that helps the user should be in one central place - in the user docs. I don't consider the user docs a "reference manual" (not sure what that term means). And I welcome patches. :) The problem might be where to make the cut - what is still a *frequently* asked question and what it isn't. Could you elaborate a bit? andre -- mailto:[email protected] | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
