On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 21:10 +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote: > Fair enough. But I get no indication at all in the GUI that the > attachments were skipped.
You will in 3.4. It was considered a security issue that came up during 3.3 development, so the filename blacklist was backported to 3.2 without introducing any new translatable (read: user-visible) messages. > And is it possible to convince Evolution that stuff in .kde is not > suspicious? It would have to be patched in. Not being a KDE user, how widely is ~/.kde still used? I thought KDE complied with the XDG base directory specification it helped write, or is ~/.kde a legacy directory analogous to GNOME's ~/.gnome2 ? Matthew Barnes _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
