On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 16:37 +0000, Paul's unattended mail wrote: 
> On 2012-08-27, Adam Tauno Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes, and why this whole notion of hidden and revolving and multiple
> > addresses is just stupid;
> Certainly not.  The rule of least privilege is state of the art.  The
> philosophy is held in high regard by everyone sufficiently
> knowledgeable about network security.

Really... it is mocked in my knowledgeable circles!  That is "security
through obscurity".  It is a dumb idea.  Changing your address is not
"least privilege" at all, it is just obscurity.

> > suddenly it is very difficult for me to contact someone I have a
> > legitimate reason to communicate with.
> How so?  If it's difficult for you, you have a broken or inadequite
> tool.  A proper tool enables you to supply whatever email address is
> appropriate (which is not necessarily your internal address).

No, the person I want to communicate with has changed their e-mail
address... that has nothing to do with the tool.  My messages to them
either disappears into the ether, or bounces.  Communication then has
failed.

> > I've had the address [email protected] for decades, never
> > hidden it, it is published *everywhere* from PDF files to Usenet
> > groups to mail list archives.  The SPAM level is pretty minimal.
> This is because you've been forced to use an aggressive email firewall
> (whether you know it or not).  If you need that kind of defense,
> you've already screwed up on the disclosure.

I don't fear disclosure.  I want disclosure.   HERE I AM!  If you have
something interesting to say - send it my way.  If you are a real
end-user the probability you will get blocked by the 'e-mail firewall'
is extremely low.

> Indeed, it's easy for simple users, but advanced users have better
> options.  Although I have spamassasin score my email, it rarely finds
> anything malicious -- thanks to the rule of least privilege ensuring
> that spam doesn't come in the first place.

And that it is very hard for anyone to contact you; which introduces
more of an impediment to communication than anything the EFF is whinging
about.  The EFF frequently borders on delusion regarding how users will
use their computers;  if they completely have their way everyone will be
driven to proprietary services because the Open services will be
impossibly tedious.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
[email protected]
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to