>________________________________
> From: Mike Cavanagh <[email protected]>
>To: Milan Crha <[email protected]>; [email protected] 
>Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2012, 14:11
>Subject: Re: [Evolution] Public Folder Hierarchy
> 
>
>Thanks Milan.  I only have centos systems at this point.
>
>If I have time to build a new system, I will give out a try.  Not sure if I 
>could put an rpm from fedora on to a cent os system.
>Mike
>
>From mobile
>
>


Hi :)
I thought CentOS made a point of being a free version of RedHat, which uses rpm 
(stands for RedHat Package Management)?  Also isn't Fedora a testing ground for 
packages to see if they work well enough "out in the wild", in an active 
distro, before being considered for the RedHat repos?  Do RedHat pay some of 
their devs to work on Fedora to compliment the volunteers and others that work 
on the Fedora project?  Tbh before checking at DistroWatch i was fairly 
convinced that Fedora used .deb rather than .rpm just to be weird so it's good 
to see that it really does use .rpm.  


I think even if this is all true then it's still not completely certain because 
it's quite likely that things get recompiled or repackaged before going into 
the main distro and even then there is a chance of some dependancy issue.  
Regards from
Tom :)
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
[email protected]
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to