On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 17:51 -0600, Jerry Criswell wrote: > Thank you for that answer, but I really, really don't like that > method. Maybe that could be handled differently for a POP mailbox? >
I believe there are what people are calling "real trash folder" in later versions of Evo - i.e. you can specify that the action on deletion is to move a message to a folder rather than just mark the message as deleted in the current folder. I don't know if you can selectively delete from that trash though. BUT. In all honesty, if you were one of my users, I would tell you to change the way you do things. The clue really is in the title of the folder you are using - it's trash, if it's trash, you don't want it any more, that's what trash is - the folder isn't called "might be trash but I haven't decided yet". The trash folder in all the systems I use and manage is treated differently - even if it isn't a virtual folder (or rather, isn't implemented as "mark and expunge"), it is the first thing to be emptied when space is lacking and so on - often automatically. P. _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
