On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 05:43 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> BTW, the Samba people ask that Samba4 be referred to as "Samba 4" as it
> is not a distinct entity from Samba 3, or just "Samba", now that it is
> released. There isn't technically a "Samba 4" vs. a "Samba 3". Samba
> 4.x.y replaces / obsoletes Samba 3.x.y, just like Samba 3.x.y obsoleted
> Samba 2.x.y. It is just an amazingly more powerful and flexible version
> of has-been-awesome-for-decades Samba.
hehe, yeah, I just got use to it after several years of having samba4
(alpha/beta) and samba3 being treated as separate projects, even on
packaging level.
Milan
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
[email protected]
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
