El lun, 04-02-2013 a las 15:25 +0000, David Woodhouse escribió: > On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 06:16 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > That doesn't sound that weird. *Sending* and *Receiving* are two > > entirely different operations. Receiving is POP/IMAP [and rarely > > blocked by firewalls], sending is SMTP [and almost always blocked by > > firewalls]. > > Sending should be MSA, which is like SMTP except on port 587. And is > rarely blocked by firewalls. That's kind of why the MSA port was > introduced. In 1998. > > If you're actually trying to submit via an authentication connection to > port 25, yes I would expect that to break quite frequently. I'd consider > that to be a misconfiguration. You should use port 587. And if the > server isn't listening on port 587 then *it* is misconfigured. > > > Verizon certainly does block SMTP. > > Surely they don't block port 587? > > > Hot-spotting through a phone generally stinks, they do not really > > provide you an ISP-like connection, it is more of an ISP-lite > > connection. ["lite" being a synonym for "crappy"]. > > Well, you don't get a proper IP address (neither IPv6 nor even Legacy > IP) so you're afflicted by NAT¹, but that's fairly much the same as with > many of the crappy home ISPs that people use, surely? > > _______________________________________________
Hi!
I had it on 467, I've changed it ot 587 to see if it works.
Cheers,
Lailah
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
