On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 18:03 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > Trash is really nothing but a move [and I never use Trash in any > client, > not in years - IMAP already provides a server-supported two-phase > deletion workflow]. Trash is just fighting the workflow. Honestly > I'm > not even sure how Trash works in Evolution.
Evo is primarily an IMAP client so it tends to follow the IMAP model. In IMAP, a message is marked for deletion and at some later date the *folder* (not the message) is expunged. There *is no Trash folder*! Trash in Evo is a virtual folder, which simply shows a view of the messages marked as deleted in all the folders in the account. The advantage if this is that no copying of messages is necessary and undeletion is trivial - you just toggle the \Deleted flag. On most non-IMAP systems deletion involves copying the message to a real Trash folder, followed by expunging it from the original folder, so deletion can fail because the user has run out of quota, which is when he most wants to delete. And undeleting means doing it all again but in reverse. In the traditional IMAP spec, you can only expunge a complete folder, not an individual message. IIRC later versions of IMAP allow expunging of single messages, but don't quote me. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
