On 19 August 2013 15:25, Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:08 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I would say that it's a matter of opinion whether this is correct > > behaviour or not. I don't know of a precise specification of what the > > timeout semantics are supposed to be (other than the code) so you might > > need to propose it as a change in BZ. > > Patrick, I agree that different behaviours could be wanted, but there > anyway is a "feature" I would call a bug. If an unread mail is marked > while emptying the trash, this mail will be marked as read after trash > is emptied. > That sounds like something different. There are two ways to empty the Trash: 1) Select File->Empty Trash 2) Visit the Trash virtual folder and expunge it (Ctrl-E) If you mean (1), it does sound like a bug. If you mean (2), then it's not so clear. poc
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
