On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 13:37 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 13:21 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 12:46 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > However, Evolution does change it's behaviour with each upgrade to > > > current stable versions of it's dependencies from upstream > > Either stop spreading FUD, or be way more exact. > The issues do change,
Of course they change; releases done to include changes. > at the moment it's annoying for me that Evolution > crashes when I try to sort by subject. Something in your distributions is *seriously* broken. That is not Evolution. I have not seen Evolution crash for a very long time; and I *use* it every single day for 8+ hours. > I'm serious and not trolling. What distro does provide a stable > Evolution? openSUSE. At least it is entirely stable for me, on my hardware. > It's in the mail header, but FWIW, the version is 3.10.2 on a 64-bit up > to date Arch Linux, IOW every dependency should be the current stable > release from upstream. I don't remember when the issue started, but it > seems to be one of the issues that appeared after upgrading other > software, IOW seemingly something from the dependency chain. Of course, everything of significance is built on a dependency chain. It is a problem when people believe it is OK to just willy-nilly upgrade random parts of that chain. That component W is a stable release does not mean that X, Y, and Z will run using it without issue; X, Y, and Z may need to be updated to reflect changes in W. Or at least QC needs to occur. Anyway, again, 3.8.x was stable for me, and 3.10.x is stable for me. I sort, and search, and read, and send... all day long. -- Adam Tauno Williams <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
