I've found it to be very stable, just slow and am trying to understand why.
Reid On Mon, 26 May 2014 16:58:51 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 10:28 -0400, Reid Vail wrote: > > I have a performance question: > > > > My wife is running ubuntu 13.04 with Evolution 3.6.4 and it seems to > > me that it takes a long time to load; about 30 seconds from start to > > load > > > > She does have quite a lot of data. Using the Evolution backup tool > > the compressed file is about 1gig. Her machine is not stellar but > > should be sufficient. She has a standard 7200-rpm drive and a AMD > > Athlon II X3 processor. When I watch on the system monitor the CPU > > isn't working that hard, memory is fine, but the HD light is on solid > > until software and data load. > > > > Does this seem right? > > No! :S > > I prefer using Arch Linux and a wild mix of Debian stable, testing and > unstable. > > I have got several *buntu installs on my machine, because I welcome the > effort the Ubuntu Studio developers do, even while I disagree very often > with their choices. However, I experienced Evolution for several *buntu > installs as unusable. > > Regards, > Ralf > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-list mailing list > [email protected] > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list -- Reid Vail <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
