On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 12:17 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 10:57 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > In the case when I got the error message, Evolution never asked for > > my passphrase. It only did so when I removed the offending > > destination. That reinforced the idea that there was a problem with > > my secret key. > Hi, > I do not know why that your version of gpg/gpg2 gives different error > message and behaves differently from that mine. The version as such > is > not that different, as far as I can tell, except of the distribution > version, where I use a newer (by one).
You're using an unreleased version of Fedora, presumably to keep up with Gnome development. Otherwise I agree they should be very similar. > > > > I note from the gpg manpage that the option --status-fd can be used > > to get encoded status information, including whether signatures are > > good and encryption has been successful. This might be a better way > > to generate more user-friendly error messages. > Right, and it is used by the camel-gpg-context.c. Use: > $ CAMEL_DEBUG=gpg evolution > to see what information is exchanged between the evolution and the > gpg > binary, including the status notices. > > I agree that a more user-friendly error message would be useful. I can file a bug if it would help. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
